Kenneth Blanco – Director of The US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) ) – said that Anti-Money Laundering (AML) laws will be strictly enforced in the world of cryptocurrencies.
On Nov 15, Blanco made clear that cryptocurrency companies engaged in money service businesses will have to comply with AML laws and share information about their customers.
Travel rule also applies to crypto
Speaking at a conference hosted by Chainalysis, a blockchain analysis company in New York, Blanco told the audience that the so-called travel rule also applied to digital currencies and that the government expects crypto firms to comply. He added:
“It [travel rule] applies to CVCs [convertible virtual currencies] and we expect that you will comply, period. […] That’s what our expectation is. You will comply. I don’t know what the shock is. This is nothing new.”
In what has now become known as the travel rule, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidelines require regulators and Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to collect and share personal data of transactions. The recommendation imposes the same standards on the cryptocurrency sector as are normally shouldered by the banking industry.
Blanco further pointed out that FinCEN has been conducting investigations that include compliance with the travel rule since 2014, adding that it is the most commonly cited violation among money service businesses engaged in digital currencies.
AML laws apply to everyone
In October, spoked at the University of Georgetown where Blanco said that AML laws apply to everyone. He pointed to the key objective of AML policy, which is obtaining information about who is involved in a given payment:
“There is a reason you want to know … the person on the other side of that transaction — they might be dealing in some kind of illicit activity. Whether it’s opioids … or human smuggling on the other side … you want to know who that person is.”
Blanco told the audience at the time that it is not that hard to obtain that information. “All we’re asking for is name, address, account number, transaction, recipient, and amount,” he commented:
“So when you tell me you don’t know who’s on the other side, you’ve got a big problem. Because you are required to know, and that is what our expectation is going to be.”
What’s your point of view? Do you agree with the AML policy? Please comment and let’s discuss more about that.